بررسی کارایی فرآیند پیشرفته زیستی هوازی به روش بیوراکتور بستر متحرک(MBBR) در تصفیه فاضلاب صنایع توليد مواد شوینده
محورهای موضوعی : تکنولوژی آب و فاضلابسعید پورکریم 1 * , فریبا استوار 2 , کامران تقوی 3
1 - 1- کارشناس مسئول سامانههای گندزدایی و سنجش لحظهای، شرکت آب و فاضلاب استان گیلان
2 - عضو هیات علمی پژوهشکده محیط زیست جهاددانشگاهی، گیلان، ایران
3 - 3- استادیار، گروه مهندسی بهداشت محیط، دانشکده بهداشت، دانشگاه علوم پزشکی گیلان
کلید واژه: دترجنت, لاینر الکیل بنزن سولفونات, اکسیداسیون شبه فنتون, MBBR, فاضلاب شوینده,
چکیده مقاله :
در این مطالعه، فرآیند بیولوژیکی هوازی به روش بیوراکتور بستر محترک (MBBR) جهت تصفیه فاضلاب صنایع شوینده مورد بررسی قرار گرفت. میانگین COD و LAS در فاضلاب خام به ترتیب mg/L 10231 و mg/L 210 بود. در این مطالعه، سه غلظت مختلف LAS ( mg/L 210، 500 و 1000 ) به منظور تعیین کارایی کل سیستم در حذف COD و LAS استفاده شد. نسبت BOD5/COD پس از پیش تصفیه از 2/0 در فاضلاب خام به 45/0 افزایش یافت. در سیستم MBBR در راکتور 1 با 36 ساعت زمان ماند هیدرولیکی (HRT) بالاترین راندمان حذف به ترتیب برابر 41/93 % و 95 % برای COD و LAS بدست آمد. در راکتور 2 نیز با شرایط مشابه با HRT برابر 36 ساعت، بالاترین راندمان حذف برای COD و LAS به ترتیب برابر 20/94 % و 99/99 % حاصل شد. با تغییرات مقدار هوای تزریقی از L/min 30 به L/min 50 و سپس L/min 70، راندمان حذف در مقدار تزریق هوا به L/min 50 افزایش یافت. بررسیهای سرعت بارگذاری بار آلی (OUR) نیز کاهش مقدار ویژه مصرف اکسیژن از حدود mg O2/gr MLSS .hr 11 در ابتدای دوره بهره برداری به حدود mg O2/gr MLSS .hr2 در انتهای دوره را نشان داد. این مطالعه نشان داد که با فرآیند MBBR می تواند استانداردهای خروجی محیط زیست برای صنایع شوینده را تامین کرده و به عنوان روشی کارآمد در تصفیه پساب صنایع شوینده بکار رود.
Abstract In this study, the aerobic biological process was investigated by the moving bed bioreactor (MBBR) method for wastewater treatment of detergent industries. The mean of COD and LAS in raw wastewater were 10231 mg/L and 210 mg/L, respectively. In this study, three different concentrations of LAS (210, 500, and 1000 mg/L) were used to determine the efficiency of the whole system in removing COD and LAS. The BOD5/COD ratio increased from 0.2 in raw wastewater to 0.45 after pretreatment. In the MBBR system in reactor 1 with 36 hours of hydraulic rate time (HRT), the highest removal efficiencies of 93.41% and 95% were obtained for COD and LAS, respectively. In Reactor 2 with similar conditions to HRT of 36 hours, the highest removal efficiencies for COD and LAS were 94.20% and 99.99%, respectively. By changing the amount of injected air from 30 L/min to 50 L/min and then 70 L/min, the removal efficiency in the amount of air injected about 50 L/min was increased. Organic charge loading (OUR) studies also showed a reduction in specific oxygen consumption from about 11 mg O2/gr MLSS.hr at the beginning of the operation period to about 2 mg O2/gr MLSS.hr at the end of the period. This study showed that the MBBR process, can meet the environmental output standards for the treatment of detergent industry wastewater and be used as an efficient method in detergent industry wastewater treatment.
Aboulhassan, M., Souabi, S., Yaacoubi, A., & Baudu, M. (2006). Removal of surfactant from industrial wastewaters by coagulation flocculation process. International Journal of Environmental Science & Technology, 3(4), 327-332.
Ali Baradar Khoshfetrat, Hossein Nikakhtari, Mohammad Sadeghifar, & Mohammad Shaker Khatibi. (2011). Influence of organic loading and aeration rates on performance of a lab-scale upflow aerated submerged fixed-film bioreactor. Process Safety and Environmental Protection, 89, 193–197.
Aloui, F., Kchaou, S., & Sayadi, S. (2009). Physicochemical treatments of anionic surfactants wastewater: effect on aerobic biodegradability. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 164(1), 353-359.
Antonio Albuquerque, Jacek Makiniab, & Krishna Pagilla. (2012). Impact of aeration conditions on the removal of low concentrations of nitrogen in a tertiary partially aerated biological filter. Ecological Engineering, 44 44– 52.
Aygun, A., Nas, B., & Berktay, A. (2008). Influence of high organic loading rates on COD removal and sludge production in moving bed biofilm reactor. Environmental Engineering Science, 25(9), 1311-1316.
Ayguna, A., & Yilmazb, T. (2010). Improvement of coagulation-flocculation process for treatment of detergent wastewaters using coagulant aids. International Journal, 1(2), 97-101.
Ayguna, A., & Yilmazb, T. (2010). Improvement of Coagulation-Flocculation Process for Treatment of Detergent Wastewaters Using Coagulant Aids. International Journal of Chemical and Environmental Engineering, 1(2), 97-101.
Bandala, E. R., Pelaez, M. A., Salgado, M. J., & Torres, L. (2008). Degradation of sodium dodecyl sulphate in water using solar driven Fenton-like advanced oxidation processes. Journal of hazardous materials, 151(2), 578-584.
Barwal, A., & Chaudhary, R. (2014). To study the performance of biocarriers in moving bed biofilm reactor (MBBR) technology and kinetics of biofilm for retrofitting the existing aerobic treatment systems: a review. Reviews in Environmental Science and Bio/Technology, 13(3), 285-299.
Carosia, M. F., Okada, D. Y., Sakamoto, I. K., Silva, E. L., & Varesche, M. B. A. (2014). Microbial characterization and degradation of linear alkylbenzene sulfonate in an anaerobic reactor treating wastewater containing soap powder. Bioresource technology, 167, 316-323.
Chowdhury, N., Nakhla, G., Zhu, J., & Islam, M. (2010). Pilot-scale experience with biological nutrient removal and biomass yield reduction in a liquid-solid circulating fluidized bed bioreactor. Water Environment Research, 82(9), 772-781.
de Oliveira, L. L., Costa, R. B., Okada, D. Y., Vich, D. V., Duarte, I. C. S., Silva, E. L., & Varesche, M. B. A. (2010). Anaerobic degradation of linear alkylbenzene sulfonate (LAS) in fluidized bed reactor by microbial consortia in different support materials. Bioresource technology, 101(14), 5112-5122.
Delforno, T., Moura, A., Okada, D., & Varesche, M. (2014). Effect of biomass adaptation to the degradation of anionic surfactants in laundry wastewater using EGSB reactors. Bioresource technology, 154, 114-121.
Dhouib, A., Hdiji, N., Hassaïri, I., & Sayadi, S. (2005). Large scale application of membrane bioreactor technology for the treatment and reuse of an anionic surfactant wastewater. Process Biochemistry, 40(8), 2715-2720.
Dong, Z., Lub, M., Huangc, W., & Xud, X. (2011). Treatment of oilfield wastewater in moving bed biofilm reactors using a novel suspended ceramic biocarrier. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 196, 123– 130.
Duarte, I., Oliveira, L., Saavedra, N., Fantinatti-Garboggini, F., Menezes, C., Oliveira, V., & Varesche, M. (2010). Treatment of linear alkylbenzene sulfonate in a horizontal anaerobic immobilized biomass reactor. Bioresource technology, 101(2), 606-612.
Federation, W. E., & Association, A. P. H. (2005). Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater. American Public Health Association (APHA): Washington, DC, USA.
Gaca, J., Kowalska, M., & Mróz, M. (2005). The effect of chloride ions on alkylbenzenesulfonate degradation in the Fenton reagent. Polish Journal of Environmental Studies, 14(1), 23-27.
George Tchobanoglous, Franklin L. Burton, & H. David Stensel. (2004). Wastewater Engineering: Treatment and Reuse McGraw-Hill Science/Engineering/Math, 4th Edition.
Ginestet, P., & Camacho, P. (2007). Technical evaluation of sludge production and reduction. Comparative evaluation of sludge reduction routes, 1-15.
Goode C. (2010). Understanding biosolids dynamics in a moving bed biofilm reactor. University of Toronto, Canada, Ph.D. Thesis.
H Nikakhtari, & G.A Hill. (2005). Modelling oxygen transfer and aerobic growth in shake flasks and well-mixed bioreactors. Canadian Journal of Chemical Engineering, 83, 493–499.
H. Izanloo, A. Mesdaghinia, R. Nabizadeh, S. Nasseri, K. Naddafi, A.H. Mahvi, & S.H. Nazmara. (2006). Effect of organic loading on the performance of aerated submerged fixed-film reactor (ASFFR) for crude-oil containing wastewater treatment. Iranian Journal of Environmental Health Science Engineering, 3, 85–90.
H. Nikakhtari, & G.A. Hill. (2006). Closure effects on oxygen transfer and aerobic growth in shake flasks. Biotechnology and Bioengineering, 95, 15–21.
Hye Ok Park, Sanghwa Oh, Rabindra Bade, & Shin, W. S. (2010). Application of A2O moving-bed biofilm reactors for textile dyeing wastewater treatment. Korean Journal of Chemical Engineering, 27(3), 893-899.
Jadwiga Kaleta, & Elektorowicz., M. (2013). The removal of anionic surfactants from water in coagulation process. Environmental Technology, 34(8), 999–1005.
Jangkorn, S., Kuhakaew, S., Theantanoo, S., Klinla-Or, H., & Sriwiriyarat, T. (2011a). Evaluation of reusing alum sludge for the coagulation of industrial wastewater containing mixed anionic surfactants. Journal of Environmental Sciences, 23(4), 587-594.
Jangkorn, S., Kuhakaew, S., Theantanoo, S., Klinla-or, H., & Sriwiriyarat, T. (2011b). Evaluation of reusing alum sludge for the coagulation of industrial wastewater containing mixed anionic surfactants. Journal of Environmental Sciences, 23(4), 587–594.
KARCI, A., ALATON, İ. A., & BEKBÖLET, M. (2013). ADVANCED OXIDATION OF A NONIONIC SURFACTANT: EXAMINATION OF THE DEGRADATION PRODUCTS–ACUTE TOXICITY RELATIONSHIP. Sigma, 31, 508-516.
Kim Y.M, Park D, Lee D.S, & Park J.M. (2008). Inhibitory effects of toxic compounds on nitrification process for cokes wastewater treatment. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 152, 915–921.
Koupaie, E. H., Moghaddam, M. A., & Hashemi, S. (2011). Post-treatment of anaerobically degraded azo dye Acid Red 18 using aerobic moving bed biofilm process: Enhanced removal of aromatic amines. Journal of hazardous materials, 195, 147-154.
Lauchnor E.G, Radniecki T.S, & Semprini L. (2011). Inhibition and gene expression of Nitrosomona europaeabiofilms exposed to phenol and toluene Biotechnology and Bioengineering, 108, 750–757.
Lazarova V, & Manem J. (1995). Biofilm characterization and activity analysis in water and wastewater treatment. Water Research, 29 2227–2245.
Mahvi A.H, Maleki A, & Roshani B. (2004). Removal of Anionic Surfactants in Detergent Wastewater by Chemical Coagualation. Pakistan Journal of Biological Sciences, 7(12), 2222-2226.
Mahvi, A. H., Maleki, A., & Roshani, B. (2004). Removal of Anionic Surfactants in Detergent Wastewater by Chemical Coagulation. Pakistan Journal of Biological Sciences, 7(12), 2222-2226.
Merrettig-Bruns, U., & Jelen, E. (2009). Anaerobic biodegradation of detergent surfactants. Materials, 2(1), 181-206.
Mollaei, J., Mortazavi, S. B., & Jafari, A. J. (2015). Applying moving bed biofilm reactor for removing linear alkylbenzene sulfonate using synthetic media. Iranian Journal of Health, Safety and Environment, 2(1), 204-210.
Ødegaard, H. (1999). The moving bed biofilm reactor. Water Environmental Engineering and Reuse of Water, 250-305.
Okada, D. Y., Delforno, T. P., Etchebehere, C., & Varesche, M. B. (2014). Evaluation of the microbial community of upflow anaerobic sludge blanket reactors used for the removal and degradation of linear alkylbenzene sulfonate by pyrosequencing. International Biodeterioration & Biodegradation, 96, 63-70.
Panizza, M., Barbucci, A., Delucchi, M., Carpanese, M., Giuliano, A., Cataldo-Hernández, M., & Cerisola, G. (2013). Electro-Fenton degradation of anionic surfactants. Separation and Purification Technology, 118, 394-398.
Papadopoulos A, Savvides C, Loizidis M, Haralambous K.J, & Loizidou M. (1997). An assessment ofthe quality and treatment of detergent wastewater. Water Science and Technology, 36(2-3), 377-381.
Qiyuan Gu, Tichang Sun, Gen Wu, Mingyue Li, & Wei Qiu. (2014). Influence of carrier filling ratio on the performance of moving bed biofilm reactor in treating coking wastewater. Bioresource Technology, 166 72–78.
S.J. Khan, & C. Visvanathan. (2008). Influence of mechanical mixing intensity on a biofilm structure and permeability in a membrane bioreactor. Desalination, 231 253–267
Wang, X.-J., Song, Y., & Mai, J.-S. (2008). Combined Fenton oxidation and aerobic biological processes for treating a surfactant wastewater containing abundant sulfate. Journal of hazardous materials, 160(2), 344-348.
Weiss, J. S., Alvarez, M., Tang, C.-C., Horvath, R. W., & Stahl, J. F. (2005). Evaluation of moving bed biofilm reactor technology for enhancing nitrogen removal in a stabilization pond treatment plant. Proceedings of the Water Environment Federation, 2005(14), 2085-2102.
Yousef Rahimi, Ali Torabian, Naser Mehrdadi, Mehran Habibi-Rezaie, Hamid Pezeshkc, & Gholam-Reza Nabi-Bidhendi. (2011). Optimizing aeration rates for minimizing membrane fouling and its effect on sludge characteristics in a moving bed membrane bioreactor. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 186, 1097–1102.
Zhang, S., Wang, Y., He, W., Wu, M., Xing, M., Yang, J., . . . Yin, D. (2013). Responses of biofilm characteristics to variations in temperature and NH 4+-N loading in a moving-bed biofilm reactor treating micro-polluted raw water. Bioresource technology, 131, 365-373.